In the News

Law360: Texas Top Court Will Tackle Wind Farm Contract Dispute

Texas' highest court on Friday agreed to hear an appeal in a case centering on the enforceability of a liquid damages provision in a contract dispute between an Energy Future Holdings Corp. unit and three wind farms led by a predecessor of NextEra Energy Inc. >>



Recent Publications

Current Mandamus Trends

Mandamus relief, of course, requires both an abuse of discretion (or the violation of a legal duty imposed by law) and an inadequate remedy by appeal. But when is a remedy by appeal inadequate for review of a trial court’s incidental rulings? >>

Mohawk: Limited Interlocutory Review of Federal Court Orders to Disclose Potentially Privileged Attorney-Client Information

The United States Supreme Court recognizes the attorney-client privilege as “one of the oldest recognized privileges,” meant to encourage attorneys to “provide candid advice and effective representation” and to further “broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice.” >>



Ryan Paulsen

Associate

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T + 1 214.651.5714
F +1 214.200.0683

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., University of Texas at Austin School of Law, 2007, with high honors; Order of the Coif
  • B.S., Brigham Young University, 2003, magna cum laude

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Judicial Clerkships

Justice Don R. Willett, Supreme Court of Texas (2007-2008)

Languages

  • Spanish

While clerking at the Supreme Court of Texas, Ryan Paulsen gained an appreciation for excellent appellate advocacy. Assisting with the work of the Court, he saw firsthand the issues and arguments that resonated with the justices, learning by observation how the best practitioners in the state craft written arguments and advocate for their clients in the give-and-take of oral argument.

Ryan now draws on that experience to assist his clients at every stage of the case:

  • Pre-trial: Ryan has experience drafting both discovery-related and dispositive motions in federal trials.

  • Trial: Ryan has advised attorneys in trial on relevant legal issues, assisted in trial briefing, and prepared jury charges in trials at both the state and federal level.

  • Post-verdict: Ryan has assisted in preparing for post-verdict hearings, drafted motions seeking post-judgment relief, and participated in judgment collection efforts in cases in state and federal district courts.

  • Appeals: Ryan has worked on briefs in support of and in opposition to appeals taken to the intermediate court of appeals and the Texas Supreme Court and has presented oral argument before the Dallas court of appeals.

These efforts have resulted in:

  • Affirmance by the Fifth Circuit of a take-nothing summary judgment order on employment discrimination claims; 

  • Reversal by the Fifth Circuit of a district court order of dismissal; and

  • Favorable settlements in cases before the Fifth Circuit, federal district court, and the Texas state courts of appeals.

Professional Recognition

  • “United States Supreme Court Update,” The Appellate Advocate, Vol. 22, No. 3, Spring 2010 ­– Present
  • "Mohawk: Limited Interlocutory Review of Federal Court Orders to Disclose Potentially Privileged Attorney-Client Information," Karen Precella and Ryan Paulsen, The Appellate Advocate, Vol. 22, No. 4, Summer 2010.
  • "Texas Courts of Appeals Update - Procedural," Layne S. Keele and Ryan Paulsen, The Appellate Advocate, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall 2009.
  • Speaker, "Appellate Case Update," Dallas Bar Association, Appellate Practice Section Meeting (February 2009).

Selected Representative Experience


i2 Technologies, Inc. v. Dillards, Cause No. 05-10-01645-CV (Tex. App. --Dallas 2011)
After filing of opening appellate briefs, opponent agreed to settle commercial dispute for almost $200 million less than its judgment.

Bernstein v. Thomas, 298 S.W.3d 817 (Tex. App.—Dallas, Oct. 13, 2009, no pet.).
Successfully defended on appeal a verdict in favor of purchasers of residential real estate who discovered that the seller failed to disclose substantial latent defects as required by the Texas Property Code, in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Memberships

  • State Bar of Texas, Appellate Section
  • Dallas Bar Association, Appellate Practice Section
  • J. Reuben Clark Law Society

Online Publications

06/30/2011 - Supreme Court Issues Two Significant Personal Jurisdiction Decisions
The United States Supreme Court recently issued two important opinions clarifying when a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant.

09/02/2010 - Current Mandamus Trends
Mandamus relief, of course, requires both an abuse of discretion (or the violation of a legal duty imposed by law) and an inadequate remedy by appeal. But when is a remedy by appeal inadequate for review of a trial court’s incidental rulings?

08/09/2010 - Mohawk: Limited Interlocutory Review of Federal Court Orders to Disclose Potentially Privileged Attorney-Client Information
The United States Supreme Court recognizes the attorney-client privilege as “one of the oldest recognized privileges,” meant to encourage attorneys to “provide candid advice and effective representation” and to further “broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice.”