In the News

Haynes and Boone Attorneys Widely Recognized by Texas Super Lawyers

DALLAS – Ninety-three Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys were recognized in 2011 by Texas Super Lawyers. >>

Best Lawyers in America 2012 Honors Firm, Haynes and Boone Lawyers

DALLAS – Ninety-four Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys have been included in Best Lawyers in America's 2012 ranking of the nation’s top legal talent. >>

In Texas, Two Freed Men Target Those Who Put Them Away

Thirteen years after being convicted of a killing they say they didn't commit--and three years after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals vacated their convictions--Jesus Ramirez and Alberto Sifuentes are back before a jury this week. This time around, though, the two men are on the offensive.

Ramirez and Sifuentes are plaintiffs in a civil rights case filed against a variety of individuals and entities that they blame for their wrongful convictions. The two men are represented in the matter, which went to trial Monday in Lubbock federal district court, by the same Haynes and Boone lawyers who helped free them from prison after 12 years. >>

Haynes and Boone Highly Recognized By Chambers USA

DALLAS – Fifty Haynes and Boone, LLP lawyers have been recognized by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2011 in its annual law firm rankings. >>

Haynes and Boone Obtains Important Victory in Stock Options Backdating Case

DALLAS – A federal judge in the Northern District of Texas has dismissed the majority of the Securities & Exchange Commission’s suit against Haynes and Boone client Douglas Bartek, the former chairman and CEO of Plano-based Microtune, Inc.

The SEC sued Mr. Bartek and others in 2008, alleging that Microtune had awarded backdated stock options to its employees without accounting for them properly. Haynes and Boone argued in a motion for summary judgment that the SEC’s complaint was based on conduct that occurred nearly ten years ago, and was barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2462. U.S. District Judge Jane J. Boyle agreed. >>



Recent Publications

Supreme Court Issues Two Significant Personal Jurisdiction Decisions

The United States Supreme Court recently issued two important opinions clarifying when a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant. >>

Supreme Court Holds FOIA Responses Trigger FCA Public Disclosure Bar

The Supreme Court recently held that a federal agency’s response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request could bar a later False Claims Act case based on the information disclosed. In Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Kirk, 563 U.S. __ (2011), the Court held that a response to a FOIA request is a “public disclosure” in an “administrative report” under the False Claims Act. >>

SEC Announces First-Ever Deferred Prosecution Agreement

The Securities and Exchange Commission has reached its first-ever deferred prosecution agreement (“DPA”) with Tenaris, S.A., a global supplier of steel pipe products to the oil and gas industry. Tenaris disclosed to the Commission that its employees had engaged in conduct that potentially violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). >>



Ronald W. Breaux

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5688
F +1 214.200.0376

Areas of Practice

Education

  • B.S., Louisiana State University, 1986
  • J.D., Southern Methodist University, 1989, SMU Law Review, 1987-1989

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Ron Breaux chairs the firm's Specialized Litigation Section (White Collar Defense, Antitrust, Securities Litigation and Labor and Employment practice groups). For more than 20 years, he has focused his practice on complex commercial litigation, the defense of corporations and executives in federal criminal investigations and trials, antitrust, internal corporate investigations and government investigations.

Selected Client Representations

  • Internal investigation and remediation of a data security breach at a Fortune 200 transportation company; civil prosecution of entity responsible for the security breach.
  • Tried to favorable multi-million dollar verdict antitrust and RICO action for national heath care provider.
  • Successful defense of corporate executives in numerous civil and criminal international cartel litigation.
  • Successful defense of hedge fund and executives in an insider trading investigation by the SEC.
  • Defense of CEO of public company in stock options backdating lawsuit by the SEC.

Recent Speeches

  • "Under Penalty": Production of Documents in Response to Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas, presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the State Bar of Texas.
  • "Protecting Your Privileges: The Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine," presented to clients of Haynes and Boone.
  • "Issues in White Collar Criminal Investigations," presented to DFW Chapter of the American Corporate Counsel Association.
  • "Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings: How Deep is Deep?" presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the State Bar of Texas.
  • "Ethical Considerations in Internal Corporate Investigations," presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the State Bar of Texas.

Professional Recognition

  • Recognized by Chambers USA 2008-2011 as one of the leading practitioners in the United States for Antitrust
  • Recognized as a Best Lawyer in Dallas for White Collar Defense, Antitrust Law, D Magazine (2011)
  • The Best Lawyers in America - Antitrust Law (2006, 2010, 2012) and Litigation - Antitrust (2012)
  • Texas Super Lawyers - Antitrust Litigation (2010-2011)
  • Co-editor, Indirect Purchaser Litigation Handbook, ABA Section of Antitrust Law

Selected Representative Experience


Antitrust Counseling in Proposed Telecommunications Acquisition
Represent AT&T before the DOJ and FCC on antitrust matters related to proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA, including pre-merger integration counseling and planning.

Electronics Manufacturing Antitrust Prosecution
Representation of Chairman and CEO of a Taiwanese producer of color television display tubes and LCD flat panels in a federal criminal price-fixing case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, alleging agreements among Asian manufacturers to set prices of displays for use in computers and televisions worldwide.

Food Flavor Enhancement Investigation
Representation of worldwide food supplier in a criminal cartel investigation by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice into antitrust violations and collusion in the food flavor enhancement industry (MSG and nucleotides).

Oil and Gas Price-Fixing and Market Allocation Investigation
Representation of major oil and gas company in an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division into alleged price-fixing and market allocation among worldwide producers of refining by-products.

Positive Software Solutions, Inc. v. New Century Mortgage Corp., 476 F.3d 278 (5th Cir. 2007) (en banc)
In the case that set the standard for vacatur of arbitration awards in the Fifth Circuit, persuaded the en banc Fifth Circuit to reverse an order vacating an arbitration award in favor of a leading nationwide specialty mortgage-banking company.

United States ex rel. Williams v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., 417 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2005)
Obtained a judgment affirming the dismissal of qui tam action under the False Claims Act.

Lonza AG v. Blum, 70 S.W.3d 184 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2001, pet. denied)
In a case that redefined the standard of review applied by the San Antonio Court of Appeals in cases involving personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations obtained reversal of a trial court’s order denying a Swiss corporation’s special appearance in a wrongful termination suit alleging fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Return of Quedlinburg Treasury
Advised The First National Bank of Whitewright in connection with the safe return to its rightful owner in Germany of the Quedlinburg Treasury, known as the greatest and longest unsolved art theft of the 20th century, from which the book Treasure Hunt was written.

United States ex rel. Ward v. Commercial Metals Co.
Representation of Commercial Metals Company, a global steel manufacturer and recycling company, in a False Claims Act qui tam suit in the Southern District of Texas. Obtained dismissal of the case in the district court based on the public disclosure bar.

United States ex rel. Williams v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
Representation of Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., in False Claims Act qui tam action, United States ex rel. Williams v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (N.D. Tex.), brought by a former employee alleging false claims for payment in connection with the V-22 Osprey program and retaliation. Obtained dismissal of the litigation on a motion to dismiss and an affirmance of the dismissal at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Defense of Waste Removal Company in False Claims Act Case
Representation of waste removal and recycling company in False Claims Act qui tam action alleging false submissions pursuant to a waste disposal contract to provide pickup and disposal on Fort Hood.

Highland Capital Management Bid to Acquire Delphi Corporation
Represented Highland Capital Management LP in its $4.7 billion bid to acquire Delphi Corp. Highland, as Delphi Corp.'s then-second-largest shareholder, offered its plan to recapitalize the auto parts giant to top an earlier offer of $3.4 billion made by an investment group led by Appaloosa Management and Cerberus Capital Management L.P. Extensive negotiations were held between Highland and Delphi, with Delphi ultimately proceeding with Appaloosa/Cerberus.

SEC v. Microtune, 783 F. Supp.2d 867 (N.D. Tex. 2011)
In a stock option backdating case, won summary judgment and dismissal of all claims in action brought by the SEC against a former CEO.

Multi-Practice Team Leader - Acquisition, Corporate Governance and Regulatory Issues
Represented clients in dealing with the SEC; plaintiff class action and derivative counsel; and other constituencies in dealing with stock options backdating and other governance issues, including adopting new corporate governance procedures, handling SEC civil enforcement claims, special litigation committees, and counsel for members of the Board.

Memberships

  • ABA Litigation Section
    • Council Member (2008-2010) 
    • Co-Chair Antitrust Litigation Committee (2001-2002) 
    • Co-Chair, Task Force on the Judiciary (1998-2000) 
  • Dallas Bar Association
    • Antitrust Section, Chairman (2002) 
    • Criminal Justice Section

Online Publications

05/19/2011 - SEC Announces First-Ever Deferred Prosecution Agreement
The Securities and Exchange Commission has reached its first-ever deferred prosecution agreement (“DPA”) with Tenaris, S.A., a global supplier of steel pipe products to the oil and gas industry. Tenaris disclosed to the Commission that its employees had engaged in conduct that potentially violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”).

04/01/2011 - Limitations on the SEC: The Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2462 in SEC Proceedings
Although there is no express statute of limitations for lawsuits instituted by the SEC, numerous courts have held - and the SEC has acknowledged - that the federal “catch all” statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2462, applies to claims brought by the SEC.

03/03/2011 - SEC Enforcement: Spotlighting Outside Directors
In an action filed this week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged three outside directors of a public company with securities fraud based on their alleged failures to fulfill their roles and responsibilities as Board members. The SEC contends that by their actions and inaction, the outside directors – Jerome Krantz, Cary Chasin, and Gary Nadelman – facilitated and assisted in a massive accounting fraud at DHB Industries, Inc., a body armor supply company.

12/22/2010 - SEC Enters First Ever Non-Prosecution Agreement With a Cooperating Company
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced on December 20, 2010, that it entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Carter’s, Inc., an Atlanta-based provider of children’s clothing. This is the first non-prosecution agreement entered since the SEC announced its new cooperation initiative in January 2010 to encourage cooperation from corporations and individuals.

12/21/2010 - Horizontal Cooperation Agreements Between Competitors: Key Features of the Revised EC Guidelines
Last week, the European Commission (“EC”) adopted revised rules for evaluating cooperation agreements between horizontal competitors at the same level in the supply/distribution chain.

11/10/2010 - SEC Warns Credit Rating Agencies of Increased Fraud Scrutiny
Haynes and Boone Partners Kit Addleman and Ron Breaux discuss two recent Securities and Exchange Commission actions focusing on credit ratings agencies.

09/07/2010 - SEC Warns Credit Rating Agencies of Increased Fraud Scrutiny
In two actions released last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) signaled its new focus on credit rating agencies and foretold the seriousness with which it will approach the expanded regulatory authority granted to the SEC by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”).

08/04/2010 - The Impact of Dodd-Frank on Public Companies
Haynes and Boone has prepared a summary of significant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that may have consequences for public companies and their officers and directors, as well as related entities, along with commentary on those provisions.

02/01/2010 - Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The Hits Keep Coming
On January 19, 2010, the Department of Justice pulled back the curtain on its largest prosecutions of individuals in the history of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). About 150 agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested 22 individuals and executed 14 search warrants in the United States and United Kingdom. Those arrested are believed to represent about 16 companies involved in the foreign bribery investigation.

01/27/2010 - Federal Court Issues Injunction Requiring Insurer to Advance Defense Costs to Stanford Financial Defendants for DOJ and SEC Proceedings
Yesterday, January 26, 2010, Judge David Hittner of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an important opinion in the Stanford Financial case that paves the way for targets of criminal and civil enforcement proceedings to obtain insurance coverage for costs of defending themselves. The decision marks a significant victory for executives who have the misfortune of being caught up in a government prosecution and find themselves otherwise unable to fund their defense.

01/25/2010 - A New Era of Cooperation at the SEC
The SEC’s Division of Enforcement is implementing a series of measures designed to enhance and encourage cooperation in its investigations and litigation and, the Division hopes, expedite the enforcement program.

07/20/2009 - The 2008 Term of the United States Supreme Court: The Decisions Most Important to the Business Community
The United States Supreme Court recently issued several significant decisions affecting businesses and the nature of business litigation in federal court. The most important of these decisions are summarized in this alert.

05/12/2009 - Aggressive Antitrust Enforcement: What Should Businesses Expect from the Obama Administration’s Recent Policy Announcements?
The Obama Administration has announced its initial roadmap for more aggressive antitrust enforcement. In a speech delivered yesterday, Christine A. Varney, the Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, announced policy initiatives that were consistent with promises made during her confirmation hearings to promote civil antitrust enforcement and “rebalance legal and economic theories in antitrust analysis and enforcement.” What does this mean for corporate antitrust compliance under the Obama administration? Varney’s speech identified several areas in which businesses can expect increased scrutiny.

02/03/2009 - Legislation Requiring Investment Fund Registration Introduced in the U.S. Senate
On January 29, 2009, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Carl Levin (D-Michigan) introduced the Hedge Fund Transparency Act of 2009 (the “Act”) in the United States Senate with the stated purpose of imposing more extensive regulatory oversight of hedge funds. However, the bill is not limited to hedge funds; it generally would apply to, and dramatically impact, all private funds (including private equity and venture capital funds) that rely on an exemption from registration under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Company Act”).1

12/18/2008 - Siemens AG Concludes FCPA Investigations with Record-Setting Criminal Penalty
On Monday, December 15, 2008, Siemens AG entered comprehensive settlements in the United States and Germany related to charges of widespread bribery of foreign officials from 2001 through 2007. Siemens agreed to pay a record-setting $1.6 billion to resolve charges asserted under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"). This alert digests this landmark case and provides observations relevant to companies' FCPA compliance efforts.

09/12/2008 - Criminal Prosecution of the FCPA
The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") has provided the basis for an increasing number of criminal prosecutions during recent years. For example, The Department of Justice initiated more individual prosecutions on FCPA charges than in any other year since the FCPA was enacted, and twice as many as in 2006. The Department of Justice recently obtained a guilty plea in one of its highest profile FCPA cases in the history of the Act. While Albert "Jack" Stanley's plea has garnered significant media attention, significant events during the first two weeks of September in two other cases provide additional insight into FCPA criminal enforcement activity.  The attached alert discusses the developments in these three cases.

09/05/2008 - Recent SEC Action Reinforces Principles of Compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
This alert digests the Con-way case and highlights four principles of FCPA compliance that are reinforced by this SEC enforcement action.

08/06/2008 - Whole Foods - Where Does the Federal Trade Commission Go From Here?
Whole Foods has closed its acquisition of Wild Oats, but it may not have much time to enjoy its purchase. The Federal Trade Commission had sought a preliminary injunction to block the merger to give it time to conduct a trial on the merits, but the district court denied the motion.

06/27/2008 - Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”)
The United States government’s increase in enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) during the past five years has raised awareness of domestic and foreign corporations to the Act’s requirements. Still, violations continue to make headlines. The latest news came from Houston May 14, when an oil and gas services company agreed to pay $32 million in sanctions for FCPA violations in connection with international contracting activities.

03/05/2008 - Criminal Enforcement of the U.S. Securities Laws
This paper, presented to the Union Internationale des Avocats Winter Meeting on Claims Management, Torts and Litigation of Claims, focuses on the criminal enforcement of the U.S. securities laws.

01/28/2008 - A Second Chance: Thousands of Hours + Millions of Dollars = Two Convictions Vacated
Texas Lawyer
When Barry McNeil first read a memo about the trials of two Mexican nationals serving life sentences for the brutal murder of a convenience store clerk in a small town about 30 miles west of Lubbock, he recalls thinking, “This doesn’t sound right.”

06/16/2006 - Stock Option Backdating--How Big Are The Problems And What Should You Do?
Recently, over 40 public companies have come under investigation by the SEC or the Justice Department for improperly backdating options, and it is likely that more public companies will come under investigation in the future. At issue is whether option grants to executives and others were backdated to coincide with dates when a company’s stock price was low, thereby increasing the potential profits realized by the holders of the options if and when exercised. Improper backdating may be intentional or a result of faulty corporate procedures. In either event, serious accounting, tax, and disclosure issues result.

08/22/2002 - Compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the Post-Sarbanes-Oxley World