Main Practice Contacts

Randall C. Brown
+1 214.651.5242


In the News

David O'Dell in Law360: USPTO Wipes Out Key Rambus DRAM Patent

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Tuesday invalidated another Rambus Inc. patent that has been at the center of the technology licensing firm’s victories at the U.S. International Trade Commission. >>



Recent Publications

Law360 Guest Article: Domain Name Collateral And Trademark Tangles

For a business involved in digital distribution, a domain name and the services offered through that domain name are often responsible for a large portion of the business value. >>

New gTLD Application Window Opens January 12: What Do Brand Owners Need to Know to Protect Their Brands?

Starting tomorrow, organizations may start submitting applications for new gTLDs (generic Top Level Domains). The application window will close on April 12, 2012. >>

Dallas Morning News Guest Column: David McCombs - An inventive state like Texas deserves its own patent office

The ribbon for the Detroit satellite office of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office already has been cut. >>

Weathering the Storm: Qimonda, Patent Licenses and § 365(n)

On October 28, 2011, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued an opinion in the Chapter 15 case of Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”). The bankruptcy court held that the application of § 365(n) to executory licenses to U.S. patents was required to sufficiently protect the interests of U.S. patent licensees under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and that the failure of German insolvency law to protect patent licensees was “manifestly contrary” to United States public policy. >>

Intervening Rights and Invalidity-Argument Estoppel in Litigation After Patent Reexamination

The Federal Circuit recently resolved two issues of first impression as to how patent reexamination proceedings affect related patent infringement litigation. These two cases, Marine Polymer and Bettcher Industries, are likely to have a significant impact on both litigation and reexamination-proceeding practices, as well as the strategic interplay between them. >>

BNA Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal Guest Article: Patenting Anything Under the Sun vs. Bilski

The definition of what is patentable[1] with regard to software and business methods continues to be problematic despite the Supreme Court's attempt in Bilski v. Kappos[2] to bring clarity to this issue. >>





Intellectual Property

Our goal is to help you realize and protect the value invested in the development of products and brands. We help companies of all sizes ensure they have proper intellectual property protection.

What Sets the Haynes and Boone IP Practice Apart

The Haynes and Boone approach to intellectual property protection is to provide our clients with an all encompassing solution to protecting tangible assets and highly visible brands. All of our intellectual property attorneys treat their client’s problem as unique and realize that in patent and trademark protection, there is no such thing as a "one size fits all" approach. Every company’s technology is different and every brand is unique.

All patent attorneys should have technical backgrounds and ours do; however, we go a step further than most firms as more than half of our lawyers worked as engineers, software programmers or in a technical sales capacity prior to becoming patent attorneys. This means that our lawyers not only understand the complex legal aspects of intellectual property law but also the business roles that innovators play in leading companies.

Our trademark attorneys are all adept at managing the largest trademark portfolios and well versed at addressing the dynamism in trademark and copyright law created by the Internet.

The outsourcing and technology transactions attorneys also bring technical expertise to an area often overlooked by non-IP attorneys.  We pay special attention to the IP and technology issues associated with innovative business process outsourcing transactions.

How the Haynes and Boone IP Practice Can Help You

Clients get a tightly integrated efficient group of IP attorneys with Haynes and Boone. Our goal is to provide each and every client with exceptional and efficient service, an unparalleled understanding of the law and the knowledge and advice of a trusted business advisor.

Patents

Over the past 5 years the firm filed more than 3,800 United States patent applications in a variety of technologies including medical devices, semiconductors, nanotechnology, oil well technology, wireless technology, software and telecommunications networking equipment – to name just a few. The benefit of our patent practice to the client is the goals we establish before drafting each patent. We focus on writing solid claims and the ideas that you, the client, are trying to protect with each and every patent. Should a patent we prosecute ever end up in a dispute we want you to have the strongest protection possible.

Trademarks

The trademark attorneys at Haynes and Boone work closely with in-house lawyers and marketing personnel to design carefully crafted brand protection strategies. Our lawyers are experienced in counseling companies on the best strategies to protect their trademarks on a worldwide basis. Additionally, we help in pre-launch clearance and trade dress issues. Not only can they help protect trademarks before the USPTO, our lawyers work to protect trademarks on the Internet. We have handled hundreds of domain name disputes as well as keyword advertising claims and other instances of trademark abuse on the Internet.

Technology Transactions

Our technology transactions lawyers address the intersection of technology and contracting. In many technology transactions the transfer of knowledge involves agreements that include patents, copyrights and software. Our lawyers in this area work on licensing agreements to complex business process outsourcing arrangements.

International

The IP attorneys at Haynes and Boone routinely provide strategic counseling and management for international clients looking to secure intellectual property rights in the United States. Our attorneys understand the most optimal structures and procedures for protecting such intellectual property rights.

Industry Focus

Our lawyers provide value by knowing their client’s industry. We want to visit your facilities, talk to your innovators and see your ideas in action. We feel these types of experiences allow us to write better patents, draft better trademark applications and create better technology contracting arrangements. Our lawyers wrote some of the early patents involving nanotechnology and MEMS. We have other lawyers who are active in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields who understand ANDA filings and chemical compounds. We also work with software, including the open source model. No matter what industry you are in, we have lawyers who understand it and will work hard to make sure that they understand how your technology fits into the bigger picture.