In the News

Andy Ehmke in Giant Bomb Video Game News: The Story Behind S.978, the Controversial Streaming Bill

There have been some apocalyptic responses to S.978, a bill currently working its way through the U.S. Senate. The bill would make the online streaming of copyrighted content a felony. >>

Haynes and Boone Intellectual Property Practice Recognized in Chambers USA National Rankings

DALLAS – The Haynes and Boone, LLP Intellectual Property Practice broke into the national rankings in the recently published Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2011 annual law firm rankings.

The group was acknowledged for “its increasing presence in all aspects of IP” and for “receiving an abundance of praise for its patent work in an array of technologies, including medical devices, semiconductors, nanotechnology, oil well technology, wireless technology, software and telecom networking equipment.” Partner David McCombs was singled out for being highly regarded at the firm. >>

Andy Ehmke in Giant Bomb Video Game News: PSN Hacked: What Sony's Security Breach Means To You (And What Comes Next)

Sony confirmed many of our worst fears yesterday afternoon, revealing an outside party had accessed PlayStation Network and gained access to vital personal information about its 77 million registered accounts. >>

Haynes and Boone Named A Top 30 Law Firm For Interactive Gaming and Cyberspace Law

DALLAS –Interactive Age has named Haynes and Boone, LLP among the top 30 law firms for business and technology issues pertaining to video games, new media and interactive entertainment.

Interactive Age’s survey showed only 530 attorneys nationwide are focused on the rapidly developing gaming industry, which is exhibiting explosive growth and an increasing number of transactions. Haynes and Boone has more than 70 full-time intellectual property and technology attorneys with a dozen focused primarily on gaming and cyberspace law.

The Interactive Age rankings were released in advance of the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Game::Business::Law summit. Andy Ehmke, a partner in the firm’s IP practice and head of the gaming and cyberspace group, has been an active participant in Game::Business::Law since its inception three years ago. At the Jan. 26 Game::Business::Law summit, Mr. Ehmke will serve on a panel discussing the risks and obligations associated with privacy rights and personal data. Mr. Ehmke is a founder and regular contributor to the successful blog “Lawyers in a Gamer's World” (www.lawyersinagamersworld.com). >>



Recent Publications

Weathering the Storm: Qimonda, Patent Licenses and § 365(n)

On October 28, 2011, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued an opinion in the Chapter 15 case of Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”). The bankruptcy court held that the application of § 365(n) to executory licenses to U.S. patents was required to sufficiently protect the interests of U.S. patent licensees under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and that the failure of German insolvency law to protect patent licensees was “manifestly contrary” to United States public policy. >>



Andrew S. Ehmke

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5116
F +1 214.200.0808


Andy Ehmke focuses his practice on intellectual property portfolio issues facing companies in the software, computer, video game and mobile device industries. Prior to joining Haynes and Boone, Andy was an information systems manager and consultant, and also worked as a programmer designing object-oriented programs for hand-held computing devices.

Andy's experience includes:

  • Developing sophisticated patent reexamination strategies for high profile technology companies.
  • Representing technology companies in patent portfolio development and intellectual property infringement matters.
  • Protecting and using intellectual property to establish a competitive position in the marketplace.
  • Providing comprehensive strategies for enforcing, defending and litigating intellectual property rights.
  • Preparing and negotiating licensing, distribution and marketing agreements in the video game industry.
  • Preparing and negotiating technology, software, patent, and know-how licenses.
  • Providing advice regarding electronic commerce and website issues, including privacy policies and copyright compliance.
  • Providing advice regarding online sweepstakes, promotions, and advertising.

Speeches, Publications, and Honors

  • Contributor, with Kendyl Hanks and Mark Trachtenberg, "Annual Review of Litigation, Chapter 3: Appellate Practice," American Bar Association, Section of Business Law, April 2011
  • Editor of the video game law blog Lawyers in a Gamer's World (www.lawyersinagamersworld.com)
  • Selected for inclusion in Texas Super Lawyers - Rising Stars Edition (2004-2009)
  • Co-Author, "Update on Mandating Data Security," Privacy & Data Security Law Journal, December 2009
  • Speaker, State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting – IP Section: "From the Contract to the Courtroom"
  • Speaker, University of Texas Technology Law Conference – "Best Practices in Hiring the Technology Employee"
  • Speaker, Austin Bar Association – Computer Law Section – "Best Practices in Hiring the Technology Employee"
  • Speaker, Dallas Bar Association – Computer Law Section: "From the Contract to the Courtroom"
  • Speaker, Dallas Bar Association – Computer Law Section: "Patent vs. Copyright Damages"
  • Speaker, 2005 Internet & Internet Security Conference, "Internet Law Developments"
  • 2005, Guest lecturer at University of Texas at Arlington on contract law
  • 2004 and 2003, Guest lecturer at University of Texas at Dallas on e-commerce law
  • Speaker, 2004 Information & Internet Security Conference, "How to Draft an Effective Privacy Policy"
  • Speaker, 2003 Executive Logistics Forum, "Co-Marketing Agreements"
  • "Privacy Policies: Pssst… Everybody's Doin' It!" – Online Publication 2002
  • "Patents as Part of the Business Strategy" – Advanced Patent Law Institute 2001

Selected Representative Experience


Successful Defense of Cendant and Avis in Copyright Case
Overcoming significant adverse rulings, Haynes and Boone lawyers won a copyright infringement lawsuit in which the plaintiff sought more than $90 million in damages from Cendant Corporation and Avis Holdings, stating that the Cendant and Avis had benefited from use of a software program he had created prior to beginning employment with the company. The court found that the plaintiff had actually created the program while working for the client, that no infringement took place and no damages would be awarded. (Wood v. Cendant Corporation and Avis Holdings Group, Inc., 2006 WL 2045839 (N.D. Okla.).

Memberships

  • State Bar of Texas
  • American Bar Association
  • Dallas Bar Association

Online Publications

01/09/2012 - Lipstick on a Pig - A Claim’s Preamble Does Not Confer Patentability on an Otherwise Unpatentable Process
In CyberSource v. Retail Decisions (decided August 16, 2011), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the claims in a software patent do not escape the patentability standards articulated in Bilski v. Kappos just by virtue of being drafted as so-called “Beauregard” claims.

01/09/2012 - Qimonda's Impact on Patent Licenses When a Licensor Goes Bankrupt in a Foreign Land
Can a U.S. patent licensee whose license has been rejected by a licensor under foreign law in a foreign bankruptcy rely on the protections of § 365(n) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code? On October 28, 2011, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued an opinion addressing this in the Chapter 15 case of Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”).

11/08/2011 - Weathering the Storm: Qimonda, Patent Licenses and § 365(n)
On October 28, 2011, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia issued an opinion in the Chapter 15 case of Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”). The bankruptcy court held that the application of § 365(n) to executory licenses to U.S. patents was required to sufficiently protect the interests of U.S. patent licensees under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code and that the failure of German insolvency law to protect patent licensees was “manifestly contrary” to United States public policy.

02/05/2010 - Innovation Fee: Surcharge on U.S. Patent & Trademark Protection
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) announced that, as part of President Obama’s recently proposed budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, the PTO’s budget would be $2.322 billion, a 23 percent increase over FY 2010.

12/01/2009 - Update on Mandating Data Security
A review the data security requirements of new laws in three states: Massachusetts, Nevada, and Connecticut.
Privacy & Data Security Law Journal, December 2009. Reprinted with permission.

10/02/2009 - The IP Beacon, October 2009
The IP Beacon is a quarterly newsletter prepared by the Haynes and Boone Intellectual Property Practice to inform clients and friends of trends and changes in intellectual property law.

10/01/2009 - Software Licenses: Permission vs. Forgiveness and the Law of Unintended Consequences
In a case that may prove to be as serendipitous for struggling software companies as anything else, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit wrote another chapter in the law of unintended consequences with its ruling in Cincom Systems, Inc. v. Novelis Corp. (published September 25, 2009 pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206: File Name: 09a0346p.06).

09/21/2009 - Update On Mandating Data Security
Many states have enacted statutes imposing general obligations on companies to maintain “reasonable” security procedures and practices to protect the personal information of state residents from unauthorized access or use... This article explores a few specific developments in state law.

04/13/2009 - The Erosion of Licensor’s Rights
A license agreement traditionally has been thought of as a promise from an intellectual property owner not to sue the licensee for engaging in conduct that would otherwise violate the owner’s rights. A license agreement enables the licensor to generate revenue, while retaining ownership of the intellectual property.
© Bloomberg Finance L.P. 2009. Originally published by Bloomberg Law Reports. Reprinted by permission.

01/15/2009 - A Brand New Game: Video Game Patent Litigation Moves Beyond Base Technologies
As gamers clamor for cutting edge innovation, game and console developers continue to conquer new creative frontiers and in the process spend significant sums to advance their next great creation... Legal deathmatches are being waged over patents covering everything from console architectures to controller schemes to virtual world content.

Growing Legal Issues In The Video Game Industry
When you start playing games on your Nintendo Wii, your Microsoft Xbox 360 or even your computer, you might not realize the thorny legal and business issues behind the amazing graphics and the gripping musical score. Digital gaming is one of the world’s fastest growth industries — up 26 percent last year, even with the economic slowdown — and it is no surprise that where there is money, there are lawsuits.

11/12/2008 - Patent Process Claims Impacted by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued a ruling in In re Bilski that modifies the test of whether a “process” qualifies as patentable subject matter.

10/15/2008 - Pro-IP Act Signed into Law
Yesterday the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 was signed into law.

Privacy Policies: Pssst… Everybody’s Doin’ It!

Patents as Part of the Business Strategy